A Model of Climate Policy Using Board Game Mechanics

Edward Castronova, Isaac Knowles

Abstract


This paper provides a case study of how a board game can be modified to generate a serious game. We argue that board games are an interesting medium for serious games, especially when the goal is to teach players about particularly complex systems. In that case, the transparency of a board game makes it possible for players to “see the whole boards” – to see all of the various moving parts at work. That transparency also makes it very easy to modify board games. To demonstrate these claims, we present a modification to the board game CO2 that accurately models different policy options with regard to global warming. We show how a few major changes to the original game’s point systems, as well as removal of certain extraneous features, can significantly improve the game, adding an instructional value. The game allows players to experiment with several policy options, including carbon taxes, carbon emissions permit sales, and clean energy research support, and lets players see how these policies interact. We discuss ways that teachers, advocates, journalists, and others can the Climate Policy mod to more easily explain the incredibly complex interactions of power markets, carbon dioxide emissions, and public policy.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, E. and Dormans, J., Game Mechanics: Advanced Game Design. Berkeley: New Riders Games, 2012.

Barczak, G. and Vesley, D., Innovation and marketing in the video game industry: avoiding the performance trap. Burlington, VT.: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2010.

Bogost, I. Airport Security. http://www.persuasivegames.com/games/game.aspx?game=arcadewireairport, 2006.

Bogost, I, Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.

Catalano, C. E., Luccini, A.M., and Mortara, M., Guidelines for an Effective Design of Serious Games. International Journal of Serious Games Vol. 1, Nr. 1, np, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v1i1.8

Chwe, M., Jane Austen, Game Theorist. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2013.

Darrow, C. D. Monopoly: the property trading board game. Eastwood, N.S.W,: Hasbro / Parker, 2006.

Gee, J.P., What Videogames Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave, 2007.

Heeter, C., Yaske, J.D. Starr, B. DNA Roulette. http://genetics.thetech.org/online-exhibits/dna-roulette, 2012.

Koster, R. A Theory of Fun for Game Design, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, 2013

Lacerda, V. CO2. Rome: Giochix.it, 2012.

Lamorisse, A. Risk: The game of strategic conquest. Pawtucket, Rhode Island: Hasbro, 1959.

McGonigal, J., World Without Oil. http://worldwithoutoil.org/, 2007

McGonigal, J. Reality is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. New York: Penguin, 2011.

Torrente, J., Vallejo-Pinto, J.A., Morego-Ger, P., Fernández-Manjón, B., “Introducing Accessibility Features in an Educational Game Authoring Tool: The Experience.” In proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2011), Athens, Georgia, USA, July 6-8, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icalt.2011.106

Zoss, M., “The Art of Game Polish: Developers Speak”. Gamasutra: http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/132611/the_art_of_game_polish_developers_.php, 2009.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v2i3.77

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Serious Games Society


Creative Commons LicenseThe International Journal of Serious Games (IJSG) by Serious Games Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.