Gamification and Smart, Competence-Centered Feedback: Promising Experiences in the Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v1i1.7Abstract
Gamification appears being a promising approach to utilize the strong motivational potential of “gaming” in classroom without suffering from shortcomings such as low efficiency, weak pedagogy, or maybe most importantly the high costs. In the context of a European project we developed a rather light weight tool for learning and practicing multiplications. The target age group of the tool is 6 to 8 years. To benefit from the motivational potential of games we used a “gamification” approach. Accordingly we designed and developed a game-like, attractive user interface and integrated aspects of competition. The system is capable of providing students formative, competence-oriented feedback in real-time. Tailored to the age group this feedback is presented in form of a ninja character. For an experimental comparison of the effects of different feedback modes, we realized the conditions (i) no feedback, (ii) written only right/wrong feedback, (iii) audio right/wrong feedback, and (iv) competence-based, smart formative feedback. We applied and evaluated the tool in Austrian classrooms and found some evidence for the motivational aspect of the gamification elements, in particular the scoring. We also found strong positive effects of an individualized and meaningful feedback about achievements and progress.
References
[2] Alvero, A. M., Bucklin, B. R., & Austin, J. (2001). An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings (1985–1998). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21, 3–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J075v21n01_02
[3] Anderson, J., Q., & Rainie, L. (May 18, 2012). Gamification: Experts expect ‘game layers’ to expand in the future, with positive and negative results: Online: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/ Reports/2012/PIP_Future_of_Internet_2012_Gamification.pdf
[4] Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effects of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002213
[5] Bellotti, F., et al. (2013). A Gamified Short Course for Promoting Entrepreneurship among ICT Engineering Students. In Proceedings of Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2013.14
[6] Bellotti, F., et al. (2013). Assessment in and of serious games: an overview. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/136864
[7] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81-100). London: Sage.
[8] Doignon, J., & Falmagne, J. (1999). Knowledge Spaces. Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58625-5
[9] de Freitas, S., & Maharg, P. (Eds) (2010). Digital games and learning. London & New York: Continuum Press.
[10] Falmagne, J., & Cosyn, E., Doignon, J., & Thiéry, N. (2003). The Assessment of Knowledge, in Theory and in Practice. Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, UC Irvine, USA. Available online at http://www.scribd.com/doc/3155044/Science-Behind-ALEKS.
[11] Fox, S., & Hoffman, M. (2002). Escalation behavior as a specific case of goal-directed activity: A persistence paradigm. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 273–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2404_3
[12] Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2006). Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: can formative assessment make a difference? Educational Studies, 32(4), 399-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03055690600850354
[13] Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., & Albert, D. (2011). Micro adaptivity: Protecting immersion in didactically adaptive digital educational games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 95-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00332.x
[14] Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by Rewards. The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A's, Praise, and Other Bribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
[15] Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., & Rashid, A.M. (2005). Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00273.x
[16] Montola, M., Nummenmaa, T., Lucero, A., Boberg, M., Korhonen, H. (2009). Applying Game Achievement Systems to Enhance User Experience in a Photo Sharing Service. Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era on - MindTrek '09, 94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1621841.1621859
[17] Pivec, M., & Kearney, P. (2007). Games for Learning and Learning from Games. Informatica, 31(4), 419-423.
[18] Shaffer, D. W. (2006). How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230601994
[19] Smit, R. (2009). Formative Beurteilung und ihr Nutzen für die Entwicklung von Lernkompetenz [Formative assessment and ist value fort he development of learning competence]. Hohengehren: Schneider.
[20] Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming (2), 1.
[21] Steinkuehler, C., & Johnson, B. Z. (2009).Computational literacy in online games: The social life of a mod. The International Journal of Gaming and Computer Mediated Simulations, 1 (1), 53-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jgcms.2009010104
[22] Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2005). A surprising effect of feedback on learning. Learning and Instruction, 15, 589–602.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
IJSG copyright information is provided here.
