Evaluation of Spatial Perspective Taking Skills using a Digital Game with Different Levels of Immersion
The present paper presents the results of an experiment aimed at assessing the impact of different levels of immersion on performance in a Spatial Perspective Taking (SPT) task. Since SPT is an embodied skill, the hypothesis was that the more immersive a tool is, the better the performance should be. Ninety-eight students from a local primary school have played with three different versions of a game: (i) completely immersive with a Head Mounted Display, (ii) semi immersive on a computer screen and (iii) non-immersive where no movements were possible for the player. Results showed that in the immersive versions of the game, players obtained higher scores than in the non-immersive version, suggesting that an immersive tool can better support performance in a SPT task.
 Rocard, M. (2007). Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe (pp. 20). Brussel: High Level Group on Science Education, Directorate General for Research. Science, Economy and Science, European Commission.
 Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. D. (2015). New opportunities in geometry education at the primary school. ZDM, 47(3), 319-329.
 Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29.
 Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013), The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological bulletin, 139(2), 352.
 Hainey, T., Connolly, T., Stansfield, M., & Boyle, L. (2011). The use of computer games in education: A review of the literature. Handbook of research on improving learning and motivation through educational games: Multidisciplinary approaches, 29-50.
 De Aguilera, M., & Mendiz, A. (2003). Video games and education: (Education in the Face of a “Parallel School”). Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 1.
 Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20-20.
 Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
 Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 21-21.
 Silveira, I. F., de Araujo Jr, C. F., da Veiga, J. S., Bezerra, L. N. M., & Kasperavicius, L. C. C. (2011). Building computer games as effective learning tools for digital natives–and similars. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 8, 77-93.
 Whitton, N. (2010). Learning with digital games. A practical guide to engaging students in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
 Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J., & Adams, C. (1999). The use of computer games as an educational tool: identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 311-321.
 Whitebread, D. (1997). Developing children’s problem-solving: the educational uses of adventure games. Information technology and authentic learning. London: Routledge, 13-37.
 Bottino, R. M., & Ott, M. (2006). Mind games, reasoning skills, and the primary school curriculum. Learning Media and Technology, 31(4), 359.
 Bottino, R. M., Ott, M., & Tavella, M. (2013, January). Investigating the relationship between school performance and the abilities to play mind games. In European Conference on Games Based Learning (p. 62). Academic Conferences International Limited.
 Bottino, R. M., Ferlino, L., Ott, M., & Tavella, M. (2007). Developing strategic and reasoning abilities with computer games at primary school level. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1272-1286.
 Freina, L., Bottino, R., Tavella, M., & Dagnino, F. (2016). Immersion’s Impact on Performance in a Spatial Reasoning Task. In Games and Learning Alliance (pp. 211-220). Springer International Publishing.
 Nichols, S., Haldane, C., & Wilson, J. R. (2000). Measurement of presence and its consequences in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(3), 471-491.
 Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32.
 Rose, F. D., Attree, E. A., Brooks, B. M., Parslow, D. M., & Penn, P. R. (2000). Training in virtual environments: transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training. Ergonomics, 43(4), 494-511.
 Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what, and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3), 102-111.
 Kessler, K., & Rutherford, H. (2010). The two forms of visuo-spatial perspective taking are differently embodied and subserve different spatial prepositions. Embodied and grounded cognition, 108.
 Retz-Schmidt, G. (1988). Various views on spatial prepositions. AI magazine, 9(2), 95.
 Surtees, A. D. R., Apperly, I. A., & Samson, D. (2013). The use of embodied self-rotation for visual and spatial perspective-taking. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 698, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00698.
 Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1956). The Child’s Conception of Space, Trans. F. J. Langdon and J. L. Lunzer. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
 Newcombe, N. (1989). The development of spatial perspective taking. Advances in child development and behavior, 22, 203-247.
 Meyer, M. L., Salimpoor, V. N., Wu, S. S., Geary, D. C., & Menon, V. (2010). Differential contribution of specific working memory components to mathematics achievement in 2nd and 3rd graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 101-109.
 Freina, L., & Canessa, A. (2015, September). Immersive vs desktop virtual reality in game based learning. In ECGBL2015-9th European Conference on Games Based Learning: ECGBL2015 (Vol. 195). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
 Bottino, R. M., Ott, M., & Tavella, M. (2013). Scaffolding pedagogical planning and the design of learning activities: An on-line system. Governance, Communication, and Innovation in a Knowledge Intensive Society, 222.
 Inagaki, H., Meguro, K., Shimada, M., Ishizaki, J., Okuzumi, H., & Yamadori, A. (2002). Discrepancy between mental rotation and perspective-taking abilities in normal aging assessed by Piaget's three-mountain task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(1), 18-25.
 Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110(1), 124-129.
 Desai, P. R., Desai, P. N., Ajmera, K. D., & Mehta, K. (2014). A Review Paper on Oculus Rift-A Virtual Reality Headset. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), 13(4), 175-179.
 Frick, A., Möhring, W., & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Picturing perspectives: development of perspective-taking abilities in 4-to 8-year-olds. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 386.
 Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1994). Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 3(2), 130-144.
 Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D., and DuToit, S. (2010). Advances in analysis of longitudinal data. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 6, 79–107. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153550.
 Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version, 1(7). Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4; 2014.
 Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. B. (2014). lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 2.0–20. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/package=lmerTest.
 Tremblay, A., and Ransijn, J. (2014). LMERConvenienceFunctions: A suite of functions to back-fit fixed effects and forward-fit random effects, as well as other miscellaneous functions. R package version 2.5. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/package= LMERConvenienceFunctions.
 Epley, N., Morewedge, C. K., & Keysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 760-768.
IJSG copyright information is provided here.